思维本体学实证体系来自于哪里？
Where Does the Epistemic System of Ontology of Thought Originate?
当我们了解实证的时候，我们要知道实证是来自哪里，当然来自于儒释道了。我们把所有的实证，古人在实证方面的探索，都综合起来，认识到他们在做这个实证，做这个科学实验中，他们是怎么思考的，他们的理论体系是什么? 我们该怎样去认识，怎样去把握？而我们的认识是建立在现代知识体系基础上的，也就是建立在逻辑分析的基础上，我们首先通过大家最擅长的逻辑分析，然后去分析古人的实证体系，分析这个实证架构究竟是什么？
When we speak of realization (or empirical verification), we must ask: Where does this system of realization come from?
Naturally, it arises from the integrated traditions of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism.
We consolidate the entirety of ancient empirical practices — the explorations of realization conducted by the sages of the past — and seek to understand how they thought during their process of realization, what theoretical frameworks they relied upon, and how they structured their inner “scientific experiments.”
The key question becomes: How should we understand and grasp these systems today?
Our approach is grounded in the modern knowledge system, meaning it is established upon the foundation of logical analysis.
We begin with what modern minds are most familiar with: logic and structure. From there, we analyze the realization systems of the ancients. We ask: What is the underlying structure of their realization processes? What is the architecture of their empirical systems?
然后我们从打通现代科学和古代的这些哲学，在它们之间架起一个桥梁，使他们之间能够联通起来，从而能够准确的、清晰的、成体系地掌握古代的这个实证体系。只有这样，你的实证才能是一个高效率的，才能够具有准确性，要不然，你的实证就一定是盲目的，你没法做到效率高，准确性高。
Then, by building a bridge between modern science and ancient philosophy, we allow these traditions to become mutually intelligible. This enables us to understand the ancient realization systems in a way that is accurate, clear, and systematic.
Only through this method can your own process of realization become highly efficient and accurate.
Otherwise, your realization is bound to be blind, and you will not be able to attain true precision or efficacy.
因为什么？因为古人的实证，虽然达到很深的层次，但对实证架构的认识和实证过程的认知，都建立在一个经验主义的基础上，建立在无数的人经验积累的基础上；我们知道经验是非常宝贵的，是需要我们珍惜的，一定要珍惜古人在实证方面的经验；但是经验主义是我们必须破除的，如果你始终停留在一个经验主义的话，那么你的修行一定是盲目的。(清凉月老师)
Why is this the case?
Because although the ancients reached profound depths in realization, their understanding of realization structures and processes was largely based on empiricism — that is, on accumulated experience across many generations of practitioners.
We must recognize that experience is invaluable — it must be cherished, and we should deeply respect the vast experiential knowledge preserved by the ancients in the domain of realization.
However, empiricism itself must be transcended.
If you remain confined to an empiricist approach, your path of cultivation will inevitably be blind and uncertain.